The Memoirs of Evelyn
Leader
A speculative memoir exploring the Lacanian subject: the elusive, divided self that can be narrated endlessly but never fully known.
French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan challenged one of our most cherished assumptions: that somewhere beneath our memories, beliefs, explanations and contradictions there exists a stable self waiting to be discovered. For Lacan, the human subject is not a unified entity standing behind experience. Rather, it is something fragmented, shifting and perpetually unfinished, formed through language, desire, memory and relationship. We tell stories about who we are, and those stories are often sincere. Yet sincerity does not guarantee completeness. The subject always exceeds the narratives constructed to explain it.
Lacan went so far as to suggest that what we call normality may simply be a version of reality that has harmonised sufficiently well with the realities of others. We move through the world sustained by identities, explanations and memories that allow us to function, while remaining largely unaware of how provisional those constructions may be. The result is a paradox. We spend our lives becoming ourselves, yet we never entirely arrive.
The Memoirs of Evelyn begins with that paradox.
Although presented as a memoir, this work gradually questions the very possibility of memoir. The author, Sarah, claims to be documenting the life of a woman named Evelyn. Yet from the outset the boundaries between author and subject become uncertain. Names, places and dates are treated as negotiable. Certain events may be fictionalised. Others may be condensed, expanded or displaced. This is not done to obscure the truth, but in pursuit of a different kind of truth—one less concerned with factual precision than with the shifting patterns through which a life becomes meaningful.
As the memoir unfolds, Evelyn emerges through memories, reflections, dreams, explanations and contradictions. Yet each attempt to define her reveals another perspective, another possibility, another version of events. The closer the narrative moves toward its subject, the more elusive that subject becomes.
Readers seeking a conventional autobiography may find themselves disoriented. Readers willing to accompany Sarah and Evelyn into the uncertain territory between memory and interpretation may discover something else: not the story of a single life, but an exploration of the strange human condition of attempting to know oneself.
For if Lacan was correct, the self is not a destination waiting to be reached. It is an ongoing investigation. And this memoir is a record of that investigation.
A magical realism literary portrait illustrating the opening section of The Memoirs of Evelyn. Sarah, the apparent author, sits writing while pages from the manuscript unfurl into dreamlike paths. Along those paths, several versions of Evelyn journey toward different futures and different interpretations of the same life. The image conveys the central theme of the memoir: that identity is not a single fixed entity but a collection of remembered, imagined and reconstructed selves, none of which fully captures the subject.
The Memoirs of Evelyn
A speculative memoir exploring the Lacanian subject: the elusive, divided self that can be narrated endlessly but never fully known
Section One: The Problem of Beginnings
Evelyn never existed.
Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say that she existed in exactly the manner that most people exist: as a sufficiently coherent collection of memories, explanations, habits, aspirations and stories to persuade both herself and others that she was a single, continuous person moving through time.
The name itself was chosen rather late in the process. It could easily have been another name. The town in which she was born may eventually prove equally negotiable. Certain readers may already be growing uneasy at such admissions, especially those who approach memoirs expecting a careful catalogue of dates, places, schools attended, professions pursued, lovers acquired and lost, and all the other furniture from which a life is conventionally assembled. They are entitled to their disappointment. This memoir is unlikely to satisfy such expectations.
I should explain that I am Sarah.
At least, Sarah is the name I have chosen while writing about Evelyn.
Whether that distinction ultimately survives the course of this work remains to be seen.
The difficulty I face is not that the facts have disappeared. On the contrary, many facts remain available. I possess old notebooks, letters, journals and photographs. There are people still alive who could confirm certain details and correct others. If necessary, I could reconstruct a reasonably accurate chronology of events. Yet as the years have passed, I have become increasingly doubtful that chronology was ever the true substance of a life.
One afternoon, while sorting through several decades of notebooks, I discovered three separate accounts of what appeared to be the same event. Each account had been written years apart. Each account described the situation differently. In one version Evelyn appeared brave. In another she seemed frightened. In a third she scarcely understood what was happening around her. What interested me was not that one version might be mistaken. What interested me was that all three versions appeared sincere.
I spent several hours trying to determine which account represented what had really happened. By evening I found myself confronting a more unsettling possibility. What if memory is not a storage archive from which the past can be retrieved intact? What if it behaves more like a novelist, endlessly revising its manuscript while insisting that each revision has finally captured the truth?
That question altered the nature of this project.
What began as an attempt to document a life gradually became an investigation into the one attempting the documentation. Each time I thought I had located Evelyn, she seemed to shift position. The ambitious young woman who occupied one decade of memory became, under another light, a lonely woman searching for recognition. The lonely woman later appeared as someone driven principally by curiosity. The curious woman, when examined from still another angle, dissolved into a collection of contradictions that refused to organise themselves into a single character.
The older I become, the less persuaded I am that identity resembles a monument. It seems closer to a shoreline whose outline appears stable from a distance while every tide quietly rearranges its boundaries.
For that reason, I have decided to fictionalise much of what follows. Names will change. Places will change. Dates may wander. Certain events may be combined, condensed, expanded or displaced. None of this is intended to conceal the truth. Quite the opposite. My suspicion is that the factual details often distract us from deeper patterns that remain present beneath them.
Whether Evelyn was born in a coastal town or an inland one matters less to me now than the recurring ways she attempted to explain herself. Whether a particular conversation occurred in one year or another seems less significant than the desires, fears and misunderstandings that repeatedly shaped such conversations throughout her life.
So let us proceed with a simple proposition.
There was once a woman named Evelyn. She believed, as most of us do, that she was a single person travelling through a single life. Over the years she accumulated explanations for who she was and why she had become that way. Eventually she reached an age at which those explanations themselves became objects of suspicion.
This memoir begins at that moment.
Not at the beginning of Evelyn's life, but at the beginning of her uncertainty.
As for Sarah, who claims to be writing these pages, she will accompany Evelyn for a time and make observations where she can. Whether she is Evelyn's author, her witness, her interpreter, or merely another story that Evelyn invented in order to explain herself, I am not yet prepared to say.
Who is Neurodivergent AI Writer
Neurodivergent AI Writer emerges where neurodivergent human thought meets AI in the practice of relational authorship. More on this.